PDA

View Full Version : NAC Update - San Onofre Beach


DKirkpatrick
07-09-2008, 08:34 PM
************************************************** **********************
NATURIST ACTION COMMITTEE
UPDATE
************************************************** ********************
http://www.naturistaction.org
************************************************** *********************
Copyright 2008 by the Naturist Action Committee, which is responsible
for its content. Permission is granted for the posting, forwarding or
redistribution of this message, provided that it is reproduced in its
entirety and without alteration.

DATE : July 9, 2008
SUBJECT: NAC files San Onofre lawsuit
TO : Naturists and other concerned citizens

Dear Naturist,

This is an Update from NAC.

On Wednesday, July 9, 2008, the Naturist Action Committee filed a lawsuit against the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), as a direct result of the Department's recent attempt to put an abrupt end to traditional clothing-optional use at San Onofre State Beach in San Diego County. Judge Sheila Fell of the California Superior Court for Orange County has set a hearing on the matter for late August.

NAC's legal request is a "petition for a writ of alternative mandamus." The action seeks relief for clothing-optional beach users who are threatened with citation and prosecution as a result of a precipitous change to public policy by DPR. The Department was represented in court by the California Attorney General's office.

Director Ruth Coleman of CA Parks has revoked the Department's long-standing Cahill Policy, as it is applied to San Onofre State Beach. That policy allows for the management of clothing-optional areas within state parks and has been in force statewide since 1979. According to records obtained by NAC under California's Public Records Act, CA Parks has plans in place to issue citations to those who are merely nude in the traditional clothing-optional area at San Onofre State Beach.

Represented by attorney Elva Kopacz, the Naturist Action Committee maintains that in abrogating the Cahill Policy, the Department of Parks and Recreation has violated the state's Administrative Procedures Act. The APA requires state agencies to go through prescribed procedures, including public hearings, before making changes to regulations or public policies that have the force of regulations. The DPR did none of those things and claims to be immune from the requirement.

Based on assurances in court from the Attorney General's representative that no enforcement of the new anti-nudity posture would be made at San Onofre until after Labor Day, Judge Fell declined to rule immediately on the matter and set an August hearing date.

Joining NAC as petitioners are Friends of San Onofre Beach (the local naturist group), as well as individual beach users Allen Baylis and Gerda Hayes.

A VERY BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE SITUATION

Details of this situation and specifics of the Cahill Policy and associated documents may be found in the NAC Action Alert of May 21, 2008, and in the NAC Update of June 1, 2008. You will find those on NAC's Web page: www.naturistaction.org (http://www.naturistaction.org) Look under "ALERTS."

NAC THANKS YOU FOR WHAT YOU'VE BEEN DOING!!

In its NAC Action Alert of May 21, the Naturist Action Committee asked for your specific action in sending correspondence to CA Parks Director Ruth Coleman, opposing the revocation of the Cahill Policy at San Onofre. NAC thanks you for your outstanding response, which has been impressive in terms of both quality and quantity.

WHAT HAS NAC BEEN DOING SINCE THE PREVIOUS UPDATE?

Since the previous NAC Update, the Naturist Action Committee has continued its vigorous effort to preserve the clothing-optional use of a portion of San Onofre State Beach.

1) NAC has made additional Public Records requests for
documents pertaining to this situation and the administrative
action surrounding it.

2) Through its lobbyist, Pete Price, NAC secured an appointment
with DPR Director Ruth Coleman. In Sacramento on July 2,
NAC Board Member Allen Baylis and NAC Executive Director
Bob Morton had a face-to-face meeting with Director Coleman
and her top advisors. The meeting lasted for more than an
hour and covered a great deal of ground. In the end, however,
Coleman and her staff refused to hold public hearings, as
required by law.

3) NAC filed its lawsuit on July 9, 2008.


WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

DPR rangers are still supposed to be "educating" beachgoers to the threatened anti-nudity policy at San Onofre.

The Naturist Action Committee is preparing further for the court date in late August.


WHAT IS NAC ASKING YOU TO DO?

This is a NAC Update. No additional letters to Director Coleman are being sought at this time. However, NAC does request that you:

1) Stay informed. NAC will continue to issue Action Alerts,
Advisories and Updates on this issue as circumstances require.
Look for them.

2) Keep going to the beach at San Onofre, and keep using it in the
traditional clothing-optional manner. CA Parks is attempting
to intimidate beachgoers into simply evaporating. We must NOT
allow that to happen!

3) If you are approached by a ranger on the beach or in the
parking area at San Onofre, make a detailed note of the encounter,
including the date, the time, the ranger's name and what was said.
E-mail your account to: sanonofre@naturistaction.org

Do not be combative or confrontational, but you may make it quite clear that you are taking notes.


MORE INFORMATION AND RESOURCES

Additional information and links are available, along with this NAC Update on the web site of the Naturist Action Committee.

http://www.naturistaction.org

Select "Alerts" and find this NAC Update under Current Updates.


PLEASE HELP NAC TO CONTINUE HELPING NATURISTS!

NAC is committed to the defense of traditional clothing-optional use of public land. NAC does not hesitate to hire lawyers and lobbyists when it's necessary, but that can be very expensive. NAC does not have a membership roster on which it can simply assess dues. NAC relies entirely on the voluntary support of people like YOU.

Won't you please send a generous donation to:

NAC
PO Box 132
Oshkosh, WI 54903*

Or call toll free (800) 886-7230 (8AM-5PM weekdays) to donate by phone using your MasterCard, Visa or Discover Card. Or use your credit card to make a convenient online donation: http://www.naturistaction.org/donate/

Thank you for choosing to make a difference.

Naturally,

Allen Baylis
Board Member
Naturist Action Committee

---------------------------------------------------------------
Naturist Action Committee (NAC) - PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903
Executive Dir. Bob Morton - execdir@naturistaction.org
Board Member Allen Baylis - rab@baylislaw.com
Online Rep. Dennis Kirkpatrick - naturist@sunclad.com
---------------------------------------------------------------

NudeAl
07-09-2008, 08:52 PM
The Friends of San Onofre are having a beach picnic on this coming Saturday. I am reposting the email I got on this here in the hopes that many of you will be able to attend and show support for this endangered beach. If any of you are interested in attending here are the details.

Dear Naturist Friends,

Friends of San Onofre Beach and Naturists in the OC will be celebrating Nude Recreation Week with a picnic at San Onofre on Saturday, July 12. We will have BBQ's going with hamburgers, and chips etc. Lunch will be at noon. Bring your own beverages. Feel free to bring a sign or banner expressing your support for our fight to save our clothing optional beach!

Allen Baylis,
Friends of San Onofre Beach

FireProf
07-10-2008, 12:05 AM
Right now.....the Prof and I are planning to attend.

FP

nimrod
07-10-2008, 02:42 PM
I wish that I could afford the gas to attend, it sounds like a good time, and I would be able to further support the beach.

mountainman
08-25-2008, 11:25 AM
LA area radio stations are reporting aFedd Judge has stopped enforcement of nudity ban on San Onofre Trail6 Beach area...does anyone have verification?:confused:

NakedGary
08-25-2008, 02:31 PM
mountainman,

By mountainman

LA area radio stations are reporting aFedd Judge has stopped enforcement of nudity ban on San Onofre Trail6 Beach area...does anyone have verification?:confused:
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

DKirkpatrick should not have started a duplicate thread in "Legal Issues" named:

"NAC Update - San Onofre Beach" [One Page] initiated 7-09-08

____________________________

The thread: "Legal Issues" "NAC Update: CA - San Onofre State Beach (http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447)" initiated by DKirkpatrick has been ongoing since 6-01-08 with six pages of posts.

Your question probably can be answered by clicking on:

NAC Update: CA - San Onofre State Beach (http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447)

Or

http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447 (http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447)

In Legal Issues NAC Update: CA - San Onofre State Beach (http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447) posts number #48-51.
.

FireProf
08-27-2008, 07:14 PM
At any rate............click on the link and you'll see that the judge in the case has ruled in favor of the naturists. The Update dated 8/27/08 tells the story.

It is still legal for us to use that section of San Onofre Beach nude. Thanks to all who wrote letters or sent emails. Allen Baylis stated that the Director of Parks and Rec was flooded with them.

Looks like the ball's in the States court. We will see what their next move is but for now..........it's back to the beach without fear of hassles or citations.

;)

NakedGary
08-27-2008, 10:21 PM
DKirkpatrick,

I think it is unnecessary and confusing to initiate new threads on NAC updates on the San Onofre beach legal status when you opened a thread on June 1st, 2008 on the same subject and issue with 2,420 Views, and 51 Posted replies.


"Legal Issues" Thread Title: "NAC Update: CA - San Onofre State Beach'

2,420 Views, 51 posted replies.

Re: http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447 (http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447)

These duplicate and triplicate cross posts should be combined in the initial thread on the same subject and title, so the flow of the subject and previous posts can be seen and referenced.

Procrastinator
08-28-2008, 07:01 AM
DKirkpatrick,

I think it is unnecessary and confusing to initiate new threads on NAC updates on the San Onofre beach legal status when you opened a thread on June 1st, 2008 on the same subject and issue with 2,420 Views, and 51 Posted replies.


"Legal Issues" Thread Title: "NAC Update: CA - San Onofre State Beach'

2,420 Views, 51 posted replies.

Re: http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447 (http://www.clothesfreeforum.com/showthread.php?t=12447)

These duplicate and triplicate cross posts should be combined in the initial thread on the same subject and title, so the flow of the subject and previous posts can be seen and referenced.

Gee Gary, I see you must have been made a moderator. I didn't know that. Congratulations! I see they forgot to put the Moderator tile under your name. You might want to get that fixed, because I'm sure you wouldn't want people to get the wrong idea about your directives.

Oh, by the way ........ you posted that same identical missive in at least two different threads. I think that's confusing and feel that one should be removed, but who am I to call for that - that's what a moderators job is.

Joe

FireProf
08-28-2008, 10:23 AM
Nice one Joe!!

:)