usmc1
08-19-2008, 12:41 PM
People never cease to amaze me. Yeah, I know it is banal statement and a trusty sort of cliché with which one can launch an essay. Try not to judge me too harshly. It’s a rainy day, and I’m tired. It’s the best opener I had at the moment. Okay?
<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O /><O:p></O:p>
Gay marriage is not going to end civilization as we know it! At least that’s my take on things.
I say this because in recent weeks, I have had several acquaintances, progressives who reallywant to undo the devastation of eight years of Bush and his deep-forest hobgoblins, river trolls, mendicants, and felons, tell me as an aside, “I’m as liberal as they come, but I’m not for this gay marriage stuff”. Thankfully, I didn’t get a wink and a nudge as this was said.
But, what I did get, was that “look” and a moment of awkward silence, as though I was supposed to signal a, “Yeah, me too”. I didn’t, because I don’t agree.
<O:p></O:p>
In the first place, and putting aside all the legal issues about long-term, same-sex couples who are deprived of hospital visits with one another by angry, vindictive relatives, or adoption issues, or the passing along of property—all really incredibly important issues, yes—but let’s just focus on the basics, shall we?
Why should too people who want to marry not be allowed to do so simply because they both get to use the same public restroom? Huh, tell me. You can’t, without appealing to some interpretation of the bible—and, that is a very sticky wicket. Since no one knows for certain what has been stuck in and what has been left out of that particular best-seller as it’s been passed through about four or five different languages, and translated and rewritten by various groups and individuals intent on putting their own spin on things.
Nope, it is going to take a lot more than that to pry the notion that gay-marriage is just fine, from my cold dead fingers.
I wish I’d been asked by that <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comhttp://www.clothesfreeforum.com/ /><ST1:place w:st=</ST1:place>Warren fellow at the Saddleback Q & A what my definition of marriage is. I’d have told him it is two people hooking up for some stupid and poorly thought out reason involving love, convenience, or preservation of the family name, or to make sure you’ve always got someone to eat popcorn with on Saturday night while watching a flick on TV.
Hell, I don’t know why people get married. It never turns out quite the way you thought about it at the time. For me it’s been danged good, interesting, but a good thing. For others, it doesn’t always go well. That’s life. But, if homosexuals (I would sort of like to reclaim the word gay), lesbians, transgendered, or some subtle variation of all that want to get married, more power to them. I mean after all, it’s not as though denying them marriage will make them stop doing the things that some people object to. Now, will it? Plus get it off the table (ahem) and maybe we could focus on something with real meaning.
Seriously, it doesn’t threaten my marriage anymore than old Maybelle Quicktoliedown’s five sequential, and seemingly heterosexual, marriages to, and divorces from, several variations of the same Johnny Worthlessasspit threatens my marriage. My marriage will survive, and so will yours.
And seriously, no government, federal, state, or local has any business dictating to any church who they must provide the rites of marraige. Your church doesn’t wish to wed same-sex folks, then don’t. There are plenty that will.
The flip side of that coin is that no church should be dictating to any government to whom it may or may not issue a marriage license.
You don’t approve? Fine! Don’t go to the reception and drink the free booze, don't check the registry at Nieman's, and for sure don’t send a toaster.
<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O /><O:p></O:p>
Gay marriage is not going to end civilization as we know it! At least that’s my take on things.
I say this because in recent weeks, I have had several acquaintances, progressives who reallywant to undo the devastation of eight years of Bush and his deep-forest hobgoblins, river trolls, mendicants, and felons, tell me as an aside, “I’m as liberal as they come, but I’m not for this gay marriage stuff”. Thankfully, I didn’t get a wink and a nudge as this was said.
But, what I did get, was that “look” and a moment of awkward silence, as though I was supposed to signal a, “Yeah, me too”. I didn’t, because I don’t agree.
<O:p></O:p>
In the first place, and putting aside all the legal issues about long-term, same-sex couples who are deprived of hospital visits with one another by angry, vindictive relatives, or adoption issues, or the passing along of property—all really incredibly important issues, yes—but let’s just focus on the basics, shall we?
Why should too people who want to marry not be allowed to do so simply because they both get to use the same public restroom? Huh, tell me. You can’t, without appealing to some interpretation of the bible—and, that is a very sticky wicket. Since no one knows for certain what has been stuck in and what has been left out of that particular best-seller as it’s been passed through about four or five different languages, and translated and rewritten by various groups and individuals intent on putting their own spin on things.
Nope, it is going to take a lot more than that to pry the notion that gay-marriage is just fine, from my cold dead fingers.
I wish I’d been asked by that <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comhttp://www.clothesfreeforum.com/ /><ST1:place w:st=</ST1:place>Warren fellow at the Saddleback Q & A what my definition of marriage is. I’d have told him it is two people hooking up for some stupid and poorly thought out reason involving love, convenience, or preservation of the family name, or to make sure you’ve always got someone to eat popcorn with on Saturday night while watching a flick on TV.
Hell, I don’t know why people get married. It never turns out quite the way you thought about it at the time. For me it’s been danged good, interesting, but a good thing. For others, it doesn’t always go well. That’s life. But, if homosexuals (I would sort of like to reclaim the word gay), lesbians, transgendered, or some subtle variation of all that want to get married, more power to them. I mean after all, it’s not as though denying them marriage will make them stop doing the things that some people object to. Now, will it? Plus get it off the table (ahem) and maybe we could focus on something with real meaning.
Seriously, it doesn’t threaten my marriage anymore than old Maybelle Quicktoliedown’s five sequential, and seemingly heterosexual, marriages to, and divorces from, several variations of the same Johnny Worthlessasspit threatens my marriage. My marriage will survive, and so will yours.
And seriously, no government, federal, state, or local has any business dictating to any church who they must provide the rites of marraige. Your church doesn’t wish to wed same-sex folks, then don’t. There are plenty that will.
The flip side of that coin is that no church should be dictating to any government to whom it may or may not issue a marriage license.
You don’t approve? Fine! Don’t go to the reception and drink the free booze, don't check the registry at Nieman's, and for sure don’t send a toaster.