
Originally Posted by
CFI-Phil
Just wanted to bring this back to topic a little bit.
If anyone remembers show 75 with the anti-nudity ordinance that bans nudity in public in Manteca, California.
--http://www.clothesfree.com/vids4.html scroll down or find in members area---
One of the main points that was made was where the objections were coming from. There where many letters sent in, phone calls made, people even showing up for the city council meeting. ALL OF THEM were from OUT of the area. None were from the local Manteca area. We do not have any right to have any laws in any location if the inhabitants of that location do not agree. Society laws change by the majority vote if you happen to live in such a country.
For ex: I do not think that anyone from any country can come to America and start making illegal drugs because its legal or otherwise not cared about where they used to live due to the US having particular drug laws in effect etc.
So, if the people in Scotland do not approve of public nudity, which being that he is still in jail, has been multiple times, continues to try and push what he wants vs what the Country is asking/telling him, I would say they, Scotland, do NOT approve. Nor should they have to change their outlook based on one mans actions.
IF Scotland did agree, then why hasn't a Scottish citizen march been organized that involved thousands of people to do the same walk that he did to demand justice? It would seem if they did agree with him, they would see the injustice for him being imprisoned as he has been.
Like the Bass Lake Falls, the local naturist spot. Just recently a new Park Ranger came down and told everyone to leave etc etc even though this has been an established location, and is mentioned as .gov sites. Called up the office, as did the other locals, he came back and apologized etc.