| |
ClothesFree Forums - World's Largest Naturist Community
We believe the human form is neither immoral nor inappropriate and endorse the culture of positive body acceptance.
To post a new topic, start by clicking on a specific forum. | Please follow the Terms of Service. |
 |
ClothesFreeForum.com |
EveryBODY
is good.
|
|
|
| Notices |
 NudistClubhouse.com and ClothesFreeForum.com have joined forces to provide a combined chat room. This gives you the largest group of nudists and naturists on the internet to chat with, 24 hours a day! Includes live video webcam support to meet new friends face to face! Members ONLY! |
Artistic Expressions  This is an area for members to post their own artistic creations - including poetry, photography, paintingc, drawings, etc. Submissions should be tasteful and naturist oriented. Please do not post copyrighted materials! |
» Online Users: 188 |
| 52 members and 136 guests |
| Alltan, Archaewok1, bkcthecat, bulldawg, cba4953@aol.com, clberry, davince, Flo, foureyes, Frenum8, geraldstacey, grunt123, harveym, HeyNekkid, inadoawanda, John Clark, Kari P, kirkJ, Kouak, labrat93562, Laker6, latinnyc, macbook, Mertz, michael pondlife, mm123, movetonan, navi41, Navigator, newddewd, Nude in the North, nudeM, nudemusic, nudetech, nudiarist, NudstRalph, patjimkatja, Procrastinator, puff27, qd7whr, schnauzer, sonny johnson, Steve78621, Sunbeam65, tanner2000, Tom1991, TOMY2010, turtlendragonfly, TX_Thoroughbred, ValeryDut, WQA |
| Most users ever online was 789, 01-05-2009 at 05:22 AM. |
|
 |
|
01-10-2006, 09:47 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 24
|
|
|
Art of Benetton in an European Museum.
|
01-10-2006, 10:19 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Metro Atlanta
Posts: 68
|
|
|
I do not find it offensive but it did make me lose my appitite. I hope thos folks did not have to pay for the show.
Its just body parts, but I'd have the same reaction to feet or elbows.
GFH
|
01-10-2006, 10:37 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lake Norman, NC
Gender: 
CFI Member: Yes
Posts: 0
|
|
|
A bit over the top maybe but offensive no.
|
01-10-2006, 11:13 AM
|
 |
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Finland
Gender:
CFI Member: Yes
Posts: 788
|
|
|
It is no more offensive but far too much is far too much
__________________
Sauna, the best hot place
|
01-10-2006, 11:30 AM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Florida (but not Miami)
Posts: 141
|
|
|
and the purpose of this is ---- what??
I don't find it offensive, just that I don't understand it.
__________________
"I didn't really say everything I said"
Yogi Berra
|
01-10-2006, 12:10 PM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 542
|
|
|
Well...I guess it could serve some educative purpose for children. But I think it should have shown full bodies instead of just genitals. I second everyone's opinion: a bit too much...but not really offensive
|
01-10-2006, 12:27 PM
|
 |
Silver Member
CFF Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern Calif.
Gender:
CFI Member: Yes
Posts: 1,918
|
|
I don't see it offensive at all and not sure what the problem with it is. If we're not bothered by genitalia as nudists, this wall of genitals shouldn't bother us. 
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It's different...ask me about it!
|
01-10-2006, 12:53 PM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Florida (but not Miami)
Posts: 141
|
|
|
FireProf:
Here again, I don't find this offensive, I just reiterate, what is this about? Especially since you see a small child in the arms of its (apparent) mother viewing this "artwork".
You're right- why not produce full frontal nudity? That would be, in my estimation, a more appropriate venue for art work.
I don't get it.
__________________
"I didn't really say everything I said"
Yogi Berra
|
01-10-2006, 01:15 PM
|
|
Silver Member
CFF Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern Calif.
Gender:
CFI Member: Yes
Posts: 1,918
|
|
I understand completely that you are not offended by this "art work."
I also understand that you don't get the "art work." I don't either but then again, it's "art." I don't pretend to be a lover, expert or connoisseur of art, but this is some sort of art and most art, I don't get anyway.
This art work of many different male and female genitalia should not be bothersome to nudists to stir up such comments as, "made me loose my appetite," "too much is too much," "over the top." To ask those that wrote those comments, "how is it that the sight of genitalia made you loose your appetite?"
"Too much is too much," what happens when you go to the nude beach, club or resort, do you hide your eyes after viewing 6,8,10 genital areas? "Over the top?" What exactly does that mean.......Over the top?
I just think that art comes in so many different forms and this wall of genitalia should have the least negative effect on people on this site or at least nudists in general.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
It's different...ask me about it!
|
01-10-2006, 01:29 PM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 818
|
|
|
Offensive?! Of course it's offensive! I mean, what was that woman thinking wearing that dress with those shoes!! Oy, utterly disgusting...
As for the rest of the crotchwork patchwork, it's very interesting, kinda like belly buttons, isn't it. I mean, some have an "inney" and some have an "outey".
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm a believer
I ain't no deceiver
Mountains move before my eyes.
Destiny planned out
I don't need no handout
Speculation of the wise...~Osbourne
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
