Tweet
The Australian Labor Party has not taken long at all to start acting as the social oppressors they are. It is illegal in Australia to spread the word about how bad multiculturalism is for Australia, about how the white Australian is losing all their rights so that immigrants holding an allegiance to foreign powers such as China, are allowed to do as they please.
Go out on the street and shout about how bad multiculturalism is, you are on the road for criminal conviction. What the ALP are upset about is their lack of power in punishing those who express their views on the internet so to fill this major hole in legislation, they are discussing new laws that will see any political website which they regard as hate, blocked by the Internet Service Providers(ISP's).
Taking the opportunity to hide under the discussion of Federal Labor's first budget, the Attorney-General's from the Labor governed state and territories, they are working under the cover of darkness to introduce laws that will repeal any remnants of freedoms of speech, of thought, of action, of anything they deem unsuitable for you.
Their first attacks will be on www.stormfront.org and, http://www.australiafirstparty.com.au/cms/ which is nothing but the first steps to becoming a 'Police State'. 'Australia First Party' is a political party. How long until any political party opposing the government becomes illegal? How long until we become a one party nation. As Australia becomes closer to China, so does out loss of rights that were fought for by the spilling of Australian blood on foreign shores. What a waste of spilt blood. Why won't Australians get off their fat lazy arses and fight? When did Australians become nothing but wimps, too scared of their own shadows?
Read this article from Australia's national newspaper, 'The Australian'...
Go out on the street and shout about how bad multiculturalism is, you are on the road for criminal conviction. What the ALP are upset about is their lack of power in punishing those who express their views on the internet so to fill this major hole in legislation, they are discussing new laws that will see any political website which they regard as hate, blocked by the Internet Service Providers(ISP's).
Taking the opportunity to hide under the discussion of Federal Labor's first budget, the Attorney-General's from the Labor governed state and territories, they are working under the cover of darkness to introduce laws that will repeal any remnants of freedoms of speech, of thought, of action, of anything they deem unsuitable for you.
Their first attacks will be on www.stormfront.org and, http://www.australiafirstparty.com.au/cms/ which is nothing but the first steps to becoming a 'Police State'. 'Australia First Party' is a political party. How long until any political party opposing the government becomes illegal? How long until we become a one party nation. As Australia becomes closer to China, so does out loss of rights that were fought for by the spilling of Australian blood on foreign shores. What a waste of spilt blood. Why won't Australians get off their fat lazy arses and fight? When did Australians become nothing but wimps, too scared of their own shadows?
Read this article from Australia's national newspaper, 'The Australian'...
"RACE-HATE websites could be banned under an internet censorship proposal being considered by state and federal attorneys-general.
"The plan, which is in its early stages, has aroused concern among civil libertarians who fear it could be used to stifle political debate.
"The attorneys-general, meeting in Adelaide last week, commissioned a report on the viability of authorising the Australian Communications and Media Authority to combat race-hate sites by ordering internet service providers to take them down.
"At present, ACMA polices websites that breach copyright, promote terrorism or publish extreme pornography.
"There are racial vilification laws, but the problem with the internet is you can't trace down the people," NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said yesterday.
"Any material that incites vilification and hatred is of concern. Material on the internet is a particular concern because it provides a cheap and easy means of dissemination to a very wide audience."
"The proposal, which would be open for public consultation before any decision was made, followed a referral to the attorneys by state and federal police ministers, Mr Hatzistergos said. Concerns had also been expressed by non-English-speaking groups about comments on white-supremacist websites.
"For the ACMA to be able to take down sites, it would require a new definition of the "refused classification" category used by the federal Government's Classification Board to deal with violent pornography and similar material. The proposed system could affect websites such as the one operated by the Australia First party, which was involved in the civil unrest at Cronulla in December 2005.
"An article on the group's website, signed by "Joni", compares Muslims to mould. "You have the innocent, healthy, cheese block sitting in your fridge minding its own business til one day you peel back the wrapper to see a tiny section of mould on the surface," she writes.
"Just when you think it's safe to appreciate your cheese in your own environment again you see it's back. Now darker, deeper, growing, invading, insidious."
"But Dale Clapperton, from the online civil liberties group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said a problem with banning such sites was that "it inevitably turns them into martyrs and gives more attention to the type of material you are trying to suppress".
"The best cure for 'bad' speech is more speech," Mr Clapperton said."
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-26077,00.html
"The plan, which is in its early stages, has aroused concern among civil libertarians who fear it could be used to stifle political debate.
"The attorneys-general, meeting in Adelaide last week, commissioned a report on the viability of authorising the Australian Communications and Media Authority to combat race-hate sites by ordering internet service providers to take them down.
"At present, ACMA polices websites that breach copyright, promote terrorism or publish extreme pornography.
"There are racial vilification laws, but the problem with the internet is you can't trace down the people," NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said yesterday.
"Any material that incites vilification and hatred is of concern. Material on the internet is a particular concern because it provides a cheap and easy means of dissemination to a very wide audience."
"The proposal, which would be open for public consultation before any decision was made, followed a referral to the attorneys by state and federal police ministers, Mr Hatzistergos said. Concerns had also been expressed by non-English-speaking groups about comments on white-supremacist websites.
"For the ACMA to be able to take down sites, it would require a new definition of the "refused classification" category used by the federal Government's Classification Board to deal with violent pornography and similar material. The proposed system could affect websites such as the one operated by the Australia First party, which was involved in the civil unrest at Cronulla in December 2005.
"An article on the group's website, signed by "Joni", compares Muslims to mould. "You have the innocent, healthy, cheese block sitting in your fridge minding its own business til one day you peel back the wrapper to see a tiny section of mould on the surface," she writes.
"Just when you think it's safe to appreciate your cheese in your own environment again you see it's back. Now darker, deeper, growing, invading, insidious."
"But Dale Clapperton, from the online civil liberties group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said a problem with banning such sites was that "it inevitably turns them into martyrs and gives more attention to the type of material you are trying to suppress".
"The best cure for 'bad' speech is more speech," Mr Clapperton said."
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-26077,00.html
Comment