Wherein he blogs.

[nacktman]

I must have hit on something with my Blogs they are two of the most viewed on Blogger for the past two months not bad for a couple of newbie Blogs.

In checking with the 'hits' stats I see where there are 1800 IP addresses 'hitting' the Blogs daily .. the same ones so I have that many steady readers and three times as many 'new hits' a day.

All with only a dozen or so 'invited' guests from these forums almost as my only promotion of the Blogs - I have mentioned them herein as well and nowhere else even on other forums I participate in.

So a note to Elendil - Keep up your Blog it will grow because you write some good stuff.

Thanks to all here who have stopped in to check out the Blogs and thanks for those who continue to read them.

[hm0504]

Oh nacktman, you are much too humble! ;-)

C'mon, you must post a link to your blogs so people know where to find your stuff.

[nacktman]

Just for you Albinus:

Carolina Naturally

[URL=[/URL] URL deleted by CFF Moderator

Despite the titles neither is solely about being a nudist.
The first is a general blog for general audiences about the life and times of man.
The second is a general blog for mature audiences (NC-17 ... no porn so the link may have to be removed from these forums) about the life and times of man.

PS., Albinus there are some things concerning Canada in the forums, ask Still_Boreas where to find them.

[Elendil]

So a note to Elendil - Keep up your Blog it will grow because you write some good stuff.

Will do thanks!

http://nudefreedom.blogspot.com/

[MoonShadow]

Hey nacktman, was not aware of this until I got a PM. I was not aware that you and usmc are owners of this forum. Do you have a place for us to send suggestions and ideas about the forum?

Thanks!

[nacktman]

Originally posted by MoonShadow:
Hey nacktman, was not aware of this until I got a PM. I was not aware that you and usmc are owners of this forum. Do you have a place for us to send suggestions and ideas about the forum?

Thanks!

??????????

Moonshadow, I am afraid the information you received was in error vis-a-vis ownership of this forum and its relationship to myself. Whom ever provided that information to you was/is either horribly misinformed or maliciously prepubescent, or both.
While I cannot speak to the true relationship between the ownership of this forum and usmc1, I am confident that it would be the same as mine and as such the information you received regarding that relationship was also in error.

[Naturist Mark]

I believe the owner of this site is Corky Stanton. I very much doubt that nacktman or usmc1 are Corky's sockpuppets.

Nacktman is the owner of several blogs in the Blogger system. I myself have a small political blog over there to which I infrequently repost some of my better essays.

-Mark

[usmc1]

Originally posted by MoonShadow:
Hey nacktman, was not aware of this until I got a PM. I was not aware that you and usmc are owners of this forum. Do you have a place for us to send suggestions and ideas about the forum?

Thanks!

Let's see. There's a bit more to this post than first meets the eye>

You got a pm from someone about Nacktman's post encouraging people to visit his blog. so who's stalking whom? Your cohorts snivel constantly in threads that they are being stalked. Here's the proof that it is they doing the stalking--and you, the simple tool that you are, join in

You launch an unprovoked and uncalled for personal attack utterly out of context to anything in this thread against two people who did absolutely nothing in this (or any, for that matter) threads to justify such scurrilous, unfounded and snide comments.Once again proof of what others have suggested about your cohorts: that they jump into threads with personal attack and attempt to inflame posters and then wail to the moderators about being bullied when the posters respond with force to such stupidity.

Your unprovoked, baseless, and cattily snide comment certainly removes you from your previous hypocritic posturing as an agent of peace, moderation and fairness.Hah, damned old truth will just out, won't it

You looking for a place to send your suggestions. Bend over, grab your ankles and look up! That'll work!

[MoonShadow]

Thank you, nactkman and Mark. I, obviously, was misinformed.

usmc, I don't even know what to say to your post. I have no clue as to what you are referring to as an attack and what all this "your cohorts" is about. I asked a simple question and nacktman and Mark responded informing me otherwise.

I will only say this: your post is offensive, unwarranted and vulgar.

[LamontCranston]

Shake it off MoonShadow. No harm, no foul.
USMC1 is at times paranoid. This isn't his first rant out of left field. He thinks everyone is out to get him.

Maybe he ought to lay off the steroids for a while....

[usmc1]

Originally posted by MoonShadow:
Thank you, nactkman and Mark. I, obviously, was misinformed.

usmc, I don't even know what to say to your post. I have no clue as to what you are referring to as an attack and what all this "your cohorts" is about. I asked a simple question and nacktman and Mark responded informing me otherwise.

I will only say this: your post is offensive, unwarranted and vulgar.

Yeah right. The context of your post disproves your innocence. Do I need to break it down any further for you? OK! I will.

Nacktman posts about his blogs encouraging others to visit. You post some insipid and snide remark about him and I having some sort of special relationship with the owners of this forum. I had not posted in this thread, nor have I at any time, anything about my having a blog--so, there was absolutely no reason for me to be cited in your post. You attributed your knowledge of Nacktman's post to a PM from "someone" and then you came into the thread and tossed your idiot bomb. So, blink your big blues all you want, I ain't buying it!

You initiated it and can't handle the blow back.

Which again is proof of what I and others have been saying about you and your cohorts. You come into threads, make some wild-assed remark about someone, completely OTP to the thread, and when the blow back comes you and your cohorts pile on and then whimper and pule about being bullied.

Yeah, Nacktman and Mark displayed marvelous forbearance in their replies. They're nicer people than I apparently. Yes my reply was offensive and maybe vulgar---but I don't think so, but unwarranted?, not at all!

You push--expect a shove back!

[LamontCranston]

Uhhh.. USMC1, let's do some math.
2,285 posts since November 2005. That's a sustained 100 posts a month or 3-4 per day over two years. Same numbers for Nackty only longer.

Maybe that's why some folks think you "own" the forum.

[usmc1]

They don't have an anchor on their butts preventing them from posting as much or more.

What is this fascination obsession you have with me and my posting history. Particularly since I have utterly no interest in you and yours. Except to swat away some of your more egregious buzzings.

What pray tell do any of your posts in this thread have to do with the original topic?

You'll note please, that I did not enter this thread except to respond to some snotty comment by one of your cohorts.

But, in a way it has been good, because it has been clear, demonstrable proof to the fair-minded of how you people operate. Leap into a thread with some provocative off-topic comment involving personal attack or accusation. Pile on with self-serving commentary and back and forth when the inevitable strong response comes. PM each other to come help, and then whimper, whine and pule with sniveling complaints about being bullied and picked on and then ultimately moderators come in and shut down the thread. Thing of it is, people are wise to youse guys and it ain't working that way no more!


2286 now, I suppose. But, the number of GIs your buddy Bush has gotten killed is a larger and much more telling number.

[LamontCranston]

What pray tell do any of your posts in this thread have to do with the original topic?

Well nothing.. but then again neither do yours.

And I'm not obsessed with your posts. I ignore most of them. I just took an opportunity to point out that anytime anyone logs into this forum they see usmc1 - nackty - mark - usmc1 - nackty - mark. Others come and go in between.

It's not hard to see how someone might think you "own" the forum.

MoonShadow isn't a cohort. I've never written to the gentlemen. You're paranoid that we're all out to get you.

Relax, man. Nothing here is important enough to raise the blood pressure.

As for this topic --
I sent Nacktman a PM about how much I enjoy his Nude & Nekkid blog. We're often at odds, but his blog is quite good. I said so to him and I'm saying so to you. Check it out.

[LamontCranston]

Also.. this kind of comment should stop right now today --

But, the number of GIs your buddy Bush has gotten killed is a larger and much more telling number.

President Bush isn't my buddy. I despise the man and his policies and haven't listened to or read a word he's said in months... longer.

Your buddies in Congress came into office on a promise of action and after 9 months they've failed. A weak, ineffective, unpopular president is still able to trump both Houses of Congress.

Why? Are the Democrats really that lame or are they complicit behind the scenes while only making noise up front. Focus on that.