Why Is Los Angeles County and City, and Las Vegas, Nevada so Uptight about nude or clothing optional beaches and facilities?
Nowhere in Los Angeles County is public nudity or clothing optional beaches legal, or allowed for the vast coastal beach front and millions of local residents, visitors, and tourists alike. Why?
I believe like Las Vegas Nevada, Los Angeles they fear that clothing optional beaches or facilities would interfere or take away from the big $$$ draw of entertainment, gaming, food, drink, and mainstream facilities for textiles, including the tax dollars or base those facilities draw.
Either one or both could be the west’s nudist, naturist and clothing optional draw or capital as are the Florida's resorts, clubs, and free beaches are on the east coast.
Probably wont happen as Los Angeles is known as the land of textile fruits, nuts and weirdo's for show off and the capitol of private sexually explicit pornographic industry.
Hollywood
Movie Studios
Muscle beach & Venice beach, Spring break's
Disney Land
Knots Berry Farm
Marine Land
Other Theme Parks and Water Parks
FEARED OF LOSS OF TAX $$$
Probably won't happen in Las Vegas and surrounding counties known for textile:
Gaming
Entertainment, Stage Shows, Night Clubs
Conventions
Surrounding counties houses of ill repute or prostitution.
Mainstream theme hotels and parks.
Tourist attractions, Hoover Dam, Golf Courses.
FEARED LOSS OF TAX $$$
Both Las Vegas and Los Angeles County and City could have separate areas of the existing Major theme, hotels, and parks for clothing optional use, construct new nudist and/or clothing facilities, and L.A. could develop or establish, construct existing areas, facilities or authorize private venture to establish nude, nudist, naturist, or clothing optional facilities, and beaches that would fill to capacity instantly, and be a draw not only for local but visitors and tourist alike, and bring in lots of tax revenue and business for all.
.
Nowhere in Los Angeles County is public nudity or clothing optional beaches legal, or allowed for the vast coastal beach front and millions of local residents, visitors, and tourists alike. Why?
I believe like Las Vegas Nevada, Los Angeles they fear that clothing optional beaches or facilities would interfere or take away from the big $$$ draw of entertainment, gaming, food, drink, and mainstream facilities for textiles, including the tax dollars or base those facilities draw.
Either one or both could be the west’s nudist, naturist and clothing optional draw or capital as are the Florida's resorts, clubs, and free beaches are on the east coast.
Probably wont happen as Los Angeles is known as the land of textile fruits, nuts and weirdo's for show off and the capitol of private sexually explicit pornographic industry.
Hollywood
Movie Studios
Muscle beach & Venice beach, Spring break's
Disney Land
Knots Berry Farm
Marine Land
Other Theme Parks and Water Parks
FEARED OF LOSS OF TAX $$$
Probably won't happen in Las Vegas and surrounding counties known for textile:
Gaming
Entertainment, Stage Shows, Night Clubs
Conventions
Surrounding counties houses of ill repute or prostitution.
Mainstream theme hotels and parks.
Tourist attractions, Hoover Dam, Golf Courses.
FEARED LOSS OF TAX $$$
Both Las Vegas and Los Angeles County and City could have separate areas of the existing Major theme, hotels, and parks for clothing optional use, construct new nudist and/or clothing facilities, and L.A. could develop or establish, construct existing areas, facilities or authorize private venture to establish nude, nudist, naturist, or clothing optional facilities, and beaches that would fill to capacity instantly, and be a draw not only for local but visitors and tourist alike, and bring in lots of tax revenue and business for all.
.
Comment