In the most recent issue TANaturist, there is an article on "Women in Naturism" by the president of Synetech videos. In it, he confirms some known issues, points out a paradox, then poses a new viewpoint on a widely-held naturist belief. I heartily recommend that anyone, who can lay a hand to a copy of it, should read it.
It does mention two of the commonly thought deterents to women entering naturism: gender imbalance, especially at beaches and public areas, and the behavior of certain individual men at those venues. However, he pokes a hole in the issue of body image by mentioning, as most here know, that most women that do go to naturist places and events are not knockouts. Why? Could it be that women, especially attractive ones, are still sensitive to being labeled as "loose"? And this, by extension, brings about concerns about personal safety. That said, once a fashion style, such as string bikinis, cutoff shirts, and low-rise trousers, becomes "in", many women will adopt it to appear conventional. Putting it bluntly, if being nude on the beach becomes vogue, and teenage girls will scream if made to wear anything at the beach at all.
Another point that the author brings up is the criticism of using attractive young women in videos as ambassadors of naturism. Yes, it can raise unrealistic expectations and attract the "wrong" crowd, but there is logic in what the author wrote. Basically, he states that female nudity is generally perceived as less threatening than male nudity; therefore, in trying to convince the skeptical that it is OK, using women in examples versus men should work better. It can also lay the groundwork for the fashion trend mentioned above. The article's author has had much success in recruiting models for his videos, and subsequently, most enjoy the experience and continue with the lifestyle. Have those in organized naturism choosing not to use a valid and potentially valid marketing tool?
The article's author also made mention of the need for a more active style of resort to attract younger people to naturism, but that is being addressed in another forum.
Anyone have comment? (Dumb question, I know.)
Doug H.
It does mention two of the commonly thought deterents to women entering naturism: gender imbalance, especially at beaches and public areas, and the behavior of certain individual men at those venues. However, he pokes a hole in the issue of body image by mentioning, as most here know, that most women that do go to naturist places and events are not knockouts. Why? Could it be that women, especially attractive ones, are still sensitive to being labeled as "loose"? And this, by extension, brings about concerns about personal safety. That said, once a fashion style, such as string bikinis, cutoff shirts, and low-rise trousers, becomes "in", many women will adopt it to appear conventional. Putting it bluntly, if being nude on the beach becomes vogue, and teenage girls will scream if made to wear anything at the beach at all.
Another point that the author brings up is the criticism of using attractive young women in videos as ambassadors of naturism. Yes, it can raise unrealistic expectations and attract the "wrong" crowd, but there is logic in what the author wrote. Basically, he states that female nudity is generally perceived as less threatening than male nudity; therefore, in trying to convince the skeptical that it is OK, using women in examples versus men should work better. It can also lay the groundwork for the fashion trend mentioned above. The article's author has had much success in recruiting models for his videos, and subsequently, most enjoy the experience and continue with the lifestyle. Have those in organized naturism choosing not to use a valid and potentially valid marketing tool?
The article's author also made mention of the need for a more active style of resort to attract younger people to naturism, but that is being addressed in another forum.
Anyone have comment? (Dumb question, I know.)
Doug H.
Comment