I thought this ITEM was worth opening a new topic for, your comments are invited!
If this case was in the UK the park rangers would have to prove that an indecent act took place, and nudity per se, is not indecent under UK law, therefore the rangers would have to prove that some indecent sexual act took place.
Errrm, we know different don't we? I think the park rangers would be surprised at how many freehikers there are out there.
Off Topic Warning!!
Why they added this last little comment I eludes me, but it raises a question. Why is it you call a lavatory/water closet/toilet/public convinience a bathroom when there isn't a bath in sight? Are you so uptight that you can't use the proper descriptive title for a toilet? Perhaps this explians why nudity is difficult to accept in Uncle Sam's back yard, I mean, if you have to call a lavatory a bathroom what chance is there of getting over nudity.
Just wondered!!!!!!!!
Pete Knight
From the White County News
Blitch, 59, of Clermont, was issued a violation notice and charged with public indecency
Blitch, 59, of Clermont, was issued a violation notice and charged with public indecency
From the White County News
It is unclear whether more hikers will follow Blitch's example.
It is unclear whether more hikers will follow Blitch's example.
Off Topic Warning!!
Earlier this year, the forest service built new bathrooms and a gravel parking lot for Mt. Yonah hikers.
Just wondered!!!!!!!!
Pete Knight
Comment