Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Gnostic Gospels

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Gnostic Gospels

    Ir has always seemed strange to me that Adam and Eve "saw that they were naked, and were ashamed." according to Genisis. Yet they were made "in the image of God." God was ashamed of his own image?'
    In Dan Brown's recent best seller, "The DaVinci Code," he mentions the lost gospels. A recent commentary, entitled "Secrets of the Code" there is a quote from one of these, the Gospel of Thomas (Doubting Thomas), copies of which were discovered in Egypt,towit: "From "The Gosple of Thomas", translated by Thomas O. Lambdin
    These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas wrote down..----
    His disciples aid, "When will you become revealed to us and when shall we see you?"
    Jesus said, "When you disrobe without being ashamed and take up your garments and place them under your feet like little children and tread on them, then will you see the son of the livngone, and you will not be afraid."
    I have no idea of what custom the "tread on them" is referring to, and neither does the Gosple, apparently, as there is no explanation here or in other sources. The lost gosples (those not "cannonized" and included in the "Bible") are commented on also in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Apparently there is a lot of pure human judgement by the Council of Nicea which left out a lot of interesting stuff.

  • #2
    Ir has always seemed strange to me that Adam and Eve "saw that they were naked, and were ashamed." according to Genisis. Yet they were made "in the image of God." God was ashamed of his own image?'
    In Dan Brown's recent best seller, "The DaVinci Code," he mentions the lost gospels. A recent commentary, entitled "Secrets of the Code" there is a quote from one of these, the Gospel of Thomas (Doubting Thomas), copies of which were discovered in Egypt,towit: "From "The Gosple of Thomas", translated by Thomas O. Lambdin
    These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas wrote down..----
    His disciples aid, "When will you become revealed to us and when shall we see you?"
    Jesus said, "When you disrobe without being ashamed and take up your garments and place them under your feet like little children and tread on them, then will you see the son of the livngone, and you will not be afraid."
    I have no idea of what custom the "tread on them" is referring to, and neither does the Gosple, apparently, as there is no explanation here or in other sources. The lost gosples (those not "cannonized" and included in the "Bible") are commented on also in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Apparently there is a lot of pure human judgement by the Council of Nicea which left out a lot of interesting stuff.

    Comment


    • #3
      quote:
      Originally posted by seniorfly:
      Ir has always seemed strange to me that Adam and Eve "saw that they were naked, and were ashamed." according to Genisis. Yet they were made "in the image of God." God was ashamed of his own image?'


      According to the Bible, they weren't ashamed until the serpent smoothtalked them into eating the forbidden fruit, after which they learned or became aware of shame, lust, good, evil, etc.

      Basically, the devil and their own disobedience made them ashamed of their nakedness, not God himself.

      Comment


      • #4
        In reality there are more than four ancient gospels available, including the gospel of Thomas, gospel of Mary, the "Q" gospel: about 20 gospels in all.

        All the writings of the gospels relied greatly upon oral traditions, (not print traditions). Oral tradition passed down over more than one hundred and fifty years, is hearsay evidence, second-hand evidence from a rather primitive peoples.

        The oldest copies of manuscripts of gospels are from around 200 AD, except for some very small manuscript fragments from around 125 AD that are too small to contain much to read. These manuscripts from around 200 AD are not original manuscripts, but they are many ancient copies in a different language from the original, and by different scribes whose copies differ from one another, to a degree.

        The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are located in Chester Beatty Library in Dublin Ireland. These New Testament documents are a collection from a wealthy American mining engineeer. They are copies, of copies, of copies of lost originals. The originals were a century and a half before this. Paul wrote one letter in his own hand and dictated the others to a scribe to write down on papyrus.

        http://www.cbl.ie/imagegallery/gallery.asp?sec=3&order=1

        At the Council of Trent, Italy, a council set up by the Catholic Church, there was much discussion and disagreement as to which books should be considered the holy cannon, but on April 7, 1546 they took a vote as to whether (the present) books of the Bible shall be considered the Holy Cannon. The contentious vote was as follows;

      • 24 votes for

      • 15 votes against

      • 16 abstensions

      Comment


      • #5
        It is not necessary to accept Gnostic doctrine to embrace body freedom.

        The Protestant canon of scripture is replete with practical examples of biblical characters who lived as if nudity is no big deal.

        Comment


        • #6
          Hi Brian, thanks for those links. I first learned about the gnostic gospels when reading "Living Buddha Living Christ" by Thich Nhat Hanh. It was eye opening for me. Since then I have read books by Marcus Borg, John Shelby Spong and some of one by Elaine Pagel (?). I can tell you I have a whole different perspective now. Hopefully it is a broader perspective.

          I have also been practising yoga and love some of the philosophy I have learned from it. A related but different book is Yoga and the Quest for the True Self by Stephen Cope.

          Comment


          • #7
            Oddly enough, yesterday, my local paper, The Dallas Morning News, reviewed "The Gnostic Gospels of Jesus : The Definitive Collection of Mystical Gospels and Secret Books about Jesus of Nazareth" by Marvin Meyer.

            The review seemed to be going along just fine up until the last paragraph, when, in no uncertain terms, the reviewer turned sour and proclaimed that the book was NOT CHRISTIAN.

            I thought it was funny because it was such a complete turn around from the rest of the review, and that he was so vehement in his statement.

            Justin

            Comment


            • #8
              quote:
              Originally posted by Naked_Justin:
              The review seemed to be going along just fine up until the last paragraph, when, in no uncertain terms, the reviewer turned sour and proclaimed that the book was NOT CHRISTIAN.
              Justin


              Not Christian because it doesn't fit the normal story?

              Comment


              • #9
                quote:
                Originally posted by Still_Boreas:
                ....I have read books by Marcus Borg, John Shelby Spong and some of one by Elaine Pagel (?). I can tell you I have a whole different perspective now. Hopefully it is a broader perspective.

                Still_Boreas,
                You would be interested in similar books by John Dominic Crossan who has spent 25 years investigating all aspects of the historical Jesus by studying the time of Jesus from various writings including the Bible of course, and Josephus, an ancient contemporary historian, as well as the cultural, political, archaeological, economic and other aspects of the time of Jesus.

                Comment


                • #10
                  I am not qualified to make a judgement on the gnostic writings, except to say that most bibles don't include them.

                  As for Ghandi's comments, I agree completely! There are many professed christians, but few real follower's of Christ.

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    quote:
                    Originally posted by naturalmanwa:
                    I am not qualified to make a judgement on the gnostic writings, except to say that most bibles don't include them.

                    As for Ghandi's comments, I agree completely! There are many professed christians, but few real follower's of Christ.


                    My understanding is that the reason the gnostic books are not included in the Bible is because by the time the Bible was assembled the church was already formed. The gnostic gospels did not fit the church views of the day. The orthodox crowd won out. I believe Karen Armstrong discusses this, as does John Shelby Spong.

                    Some things never change!

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      quote:
                      Originally posted by David77:
                      Still_Boreas,
                      You would be interested in similar books by John Dominic Crossan who has spent 25 years investigating all aspects of the historical Jesus by studying the time of Jesus from various writings including the Bible of course, and Josephus, an ancient contemporary historian, as well as the cultural, political, archaeological, economic and other aspects of the time of Jesus.


                      Is he the author who teamed up with (or is) an archaeologist? I believe we had a bit of a book study (chapter or two actually) with our church with his work. The name certainly rings a bell and I will have to check that out.

                      Comment


                      • #13
                        Here's the Catholic position on Gnosticism:

                        Gnosticism

                        (From The Catholic Encyclopedia)

                        Comment


                        • #14
                          quote:
                          Originally posted by BackpackerBrian:
                          quote:
                          Originally posted by Naked_Justin:

                          The review seemed to be going along just fine up until the last paragraph, when, in no uncertain terms, the reviewer turned sour and proclaimed that the book was NOT CHRISTIAN.

                          Justin


                          Hey Justin, if you can, I'd really appreciate it if you could post a link to that review. Thanks!

                          So the reviewer decides what is Christian and what is not? Hmmmm. Kind of like how the Church decided what was an authentic gospel and what wasn't . . . or Christians proclaiming nudism is not Christian. Brings to mind a quote from an enlightened one from our century . . .

                          "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mahatma Gandhi


                          I had already thrown out the paper by the time I read the original post. Had I still had the review, I would have put in some more complete quotes.
                          To register for the on-line version of the The Dallas Morning News you have to give them way too much information and I don't want to open myself to anymore of there junk arriving in the mail, over the phone, or dumped on my lawn.
                          It's a pretty crappy paper.
                          It's always been bad but it got even worse after they drove the only other local paper out of business about 15 years ago.
                          The address is http://www.dallasnews.com/.

                          I usually read their articles for the unintentional comedy.

                          Their movie reviewers are idiots.
                          They review ABRIDGED audiobooks.

                          Their articles are rife with grammatical errors.

                          They do have good music reviewers, though.

                          sorry about rambling on.

                          Justin

                          Comment


                          • #15
                            quote:
                            Is he the author who teamed up with (or is) an archaeologist? I believe we had a bit of a book study (chapter or two actually) with our church with his work. The name certainly rings a bell and I will have to check that out.


                            Crossan is a Irish Catholic who immigrated to America as a monk, then became a priest and then a theologian at DePaul University for probably 25 years. It is a wonder that his church did not dismissed him from his position as theologian, because of being too liberal. He married with the church's blessing. It seems that he does not go to church now, unless he has to give a lecture on the historical Jesus.
                            He is co-founder of the Jesus Seminar which had scholars from many denominations, and including one Rabbi. I have never been Roman Catholic, but this group transcends denominations. Most say that there is no one who is a greater expert on the historical Jesus than John Dominic Crossan.

                            Comment

                            • Working...
                              X